|
Podrobnosti záznamu
Název | | | General and comparative considerations of whole-rock and mineral compositions of Precambrian iron-formations and their implications
|
| Údaj o odpovědnosti | | | Arno Mücke
|
| Autor | | Jazyk | | | anglicky
|
| Zdrojový dokument - seriál | | Svazek/č. | | | Vol. 179, no. 2
|
| Strany | | | p. 175-219
|
| Rok | | | 2003
|
| Poznámky | | | 7 obr., 6 pl., 7 tab., 4 s. bibl.
|
| | il.
|
| | Zkr. název ser.: Neu. Jb. Mineral., Abh.
|
| Předmětová skupina | | Geografické jméno | | Klíčové slovo | | Abstrakt (anglicky) | | | 139 samples of iron-formations from all the five continents belonging to 16 countries and 45 localities were investigated. The investigation of the rocks is based on ore-microscopic studies, electron-microprobe and XRF analyses. The results of the whole-rock analyses reveal that the SiO2 + iron (expressed as Fe2O3) contents are mostly higher than 90 wt per cent. This indicates that iron-formations are enriched in magnetite, martite and hematite rarely goethite and SiO2 mainly in the form of quartz. These mineral assemblages represent iron-formations that belong to the oxide facies comprising the magnetite and hematite subfacies. In the magnetite-free silicate facies, the magnetite-silicate facies and the carbonate facies, the (Fe2O3 + SiO2) concentrations are lower (75.5 to 86.1 wt per cent) and the Al2O3 or the CO2 concentrations are correspondingly higher.
|
| In general, the iron-formations are characterized by their low concentrations of Na2O, K2O and P2O5 (mainly below 0.1 wt per cent). The first Fe-oxide occurring in iron-formations is magnetite in the form of porphyroblasts, whereas hematite is mainly of secondary origin due to the formation of martite (= pseudomorphic oxidation of magnetite) and its subsequent recrystallization. Goethite is the youngest Fe-mineral which originated either from the replacement of magnetite (not of hematite) or from Fe-rich descending solutions. Some of the investigated iron deposits, known as iron-formations contain minerals or relics of minerals within later and replacing quartz which cast doubt upon their classification as iron-formations. However, these deposits cannot be differentiated from true iron-formations within the [(FeO + MnO) - Fe2O3 - SiO2 = 100 per cent ]-diagram.
|
| Their doubtful origin concerns in particular the occurrence of amphiboles (magnesiohasting-site, magnesiohornblende, actinolite, tschermakite, wincheite and richterite) with Mg-numbers distinctly higher than 0.5. In iron-formations amphiboles (ferrohornblende, ferroactinolite and grunerite) have Mg-numbers markedly lower than 0.5. Other minerals of the deposits of doubtful origin are unknown in iron-formations (e.g. fluorite, allanite) or have compositions that are not known in iron-formations. These are: magnetite (with TiO2-contents up to 6.6 wt per cent); pyroxenes (diopside and aegirine-augite); chlorite (32.2 to 59.2 mol per cent clinochlore, 24.1 to 43.4 mol procent chamosite and 14.7 to 26.6 mol per cent pennantite); garnet (andradite and grossularite); and mica (mainly phlogopite).
|
| In iron-formations these minerals are: pure magnetite; Fe-rich augite and clinoferrosilite; chlorite (59.9 to 63.1 mol per cent chamosite, 21.1 to 24.4 mol per cent pennantite and 14.9 to 16.5 mol per cent clinochlore); almandine-spessartite solid solutions; and annite. Additionally, the deposits of doubtful origin contain high concentations of P2O5 (up to 0.7 wt per cent in the form of microscopic apatite). These deposits are classi
|
|
| Přispěvatel | | | Česká geologická služba
|
| Kód přispěvatele | | | ČGS (UNM)
|
| Zdrojový formát | | | U
|
| Datum vložení | | | 11. 7. 2007 |
| Datum importu | | | 8. 8. 2012 |
|
|